Sprinting
is the most harrowing aspect of cycling. The riders race shoulder-to-shoulder,
speeding along at 60 kph, all with the same goal—to be first across the line. For
the past several years, sprinting has become synonymous with one name in
particular—Mark Cavendish. With 25 stage wins, one green jersey, and four wins
on the Champs-Elysees his resume speaks for itself. In his first Tour de France,
Cavendish crashed several times in the first week and ended up abandoning. For
the next four years he won 4 or more stages per Tour (4 in 2008; 6 in 2009; and
5 in 2010 and 2011), totaling 20 stages in all. However, in the last two years combined
he has only mustered five stage wins. So, the question is, has Mark Cavendish
passed his prime?
Perhaps. Three major factors lead
me to believe he has lost his step. One: Cavendish has shown repeatedly he is
unable to win if his lead out train does not deliver him right to the line. In
contrast, Marcel Kittle and Peter Sagan have shown they are able to “freelance”
sprints. Two: Cavendish has clearly lost his ability to hold a sprint—during
today’s first stage; Sagan reacted first, beating Cavendish to the punch, a
feat that has never happened before. Third: Cavendish needs to resort to antics
to try to be positioned for the win. During the stage today, Gerrans was coming
past him and not slowing down; Cavendish chose to head butt his way into a gap
that was nonexistent.
The
last two years at the Tour Mark Cavendish has been involved in a crash inside
the last 300. Last year the stage 10 approach to the line was bit tricky. The
road curved left at the finish. Mark Cavendish collided with Tom Veelers,
Marcel Kittle’s lead out man. Veelers went down hard, but Cavendish was able to
stay upright. Cavendish was cleared of any wrong doing by the organization. (You
can view the video here.)
The point is that when Cavendish and Veelers collided, Andre Greipel had
already launched his sprint and was bike lengths ahead of him, so was Marcel
Kittle. It is irrelevant that Cavendish did not have a proper lead out. He
should have been locked on Greipel’s wheel, but instead he was sitting 5th
wheel behind Kittle. Looking at the video, he still would have gotten third
with no room to come around Kittle or Greipel, who went should-to-shoulder
crossing the line. So, in the end, he was poorly positioned. Is he losing his
instinct to navigate sprints?
Now,
let’s look at today’s crash, Cavendish was positioned perfectly, third wheel
behind Marcel Kittle. In previous years you would have seen Cavendish make the
first jump, but Peter Sagan beat him to it. Simon Gerrans followed Sagan,
leaving Cavendish to try to push Gerrans out of the way so he could follow
Sagan. (You can view the video here.)
To his credit, Cavendish has taken responsibility for his actions and admits
the crash was his fault, but feels the need to rationalize the actions. He says
that Gerrans was slowing down and he, Cavendish, wanted to get by him. After
having studied the video many times, I can only conclude that Gerrans was not
slowing down, but was in fact coming by Cavendish and had already gained a bit
of a lead on him. I believe this is a prime example of Cavendish losing a step
in his finishing kick. He waited a little bit too long and someone was able to
come over the top of him, leaving him to resort to head butting to try to make
up for his lack of finishing kick. Do not get me wrong, Mark Cavendish still
has a stellar finishing kick but, if you look back to what was arguably his
best year, 2009, some of those sprints he held for 300 meters or more. Not
anymore.
No comments :
Post a Comment